Pipes strike back

Verizon wireless announced they will be introducing tiered data plan packages within the next few months.

In order to introduce a tiered dataplan, you should be able to effectively differentiate and measure time spent downloading under specific QoS conditions and permit the user to choose among different radio access available over the same place.

It actually won’t be the case, and you’ll probably be consuming your LTE fast line bucket when available.

This differentiation will introduce a complexity grade in a scenario simplified by unlimited prepaid bundles.

In Italy, in fact, operators are often offering full time/volume access providing you pay appropriate fee.

Limits are just to discourage peer to peer over mobile.

This is a way to encourage the use of mobile internet, a way to make people used to a certain use of the internet. If you know you have still 10 hours to use a day, you won’t probably complain too much if on a specific area you are forced to reconnect several times or you are downloading very slowly.

Tiered packages instead are a sort of customized service for specific high quality needs.

But will your device or application be able to discriminate among the need to use the proper tier for its connectivity.

Will you be asked to agree for wearing off you LTE plan connectivity package by your social network application, leaving the “gold reserve” to the app for managing the download of that urgent huge document?

Flat rates for heavy usage customers are not a good deal for operators. The applications business “governed” by “smart pipe” agreements did not brought the money expected. ARPU is dropping too.

The good thing for operators is that smartphones have almost fully replaced mid and high tier devices, teenagers want applications and data connectivity and managers increased the amount of data used by the mail service improving the use of attachments.

This means the market scenario has changed, but services really bandwidth demanding are not yet commonly used.

A service potentially making customers hungry of high tier connectivity packages is mobile TV.

Until mobile streaming won’t permeate people habits, I see hard to find attractive the chance to subscribe a tiered data plan.

The fact is that mobile data and tethering needs are different.

The “tiering” of bundles makes sense only for the latter. Are you, operator, still so smart to tell about the two connections?

Unlimited bundles avoid operators very expensive and difficult ways to constantly advise user she’s running out of data available on subscribed plan, with tiered data plan this mechanism should work properly and on time.

Probably the only way to make a high tier plan attractive will consist of making it  … unlimited.

A romantic dead man walking, body and soul

First, take an hour for a deep reading of the free downloadable Mobile Developer Economics report from VisionMobile

http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2010/07/mobile-developer-economics-the-building-blocks-of-mobile-applications/&urlhash=FEXd&goback=.gde_61471_member_25064995/

When iPhone sales just commenced and were high, mobile experts thought that soon the device would have become widespread. Very smart, even my dog would have guessed so.

Then came a nice word to use: “smartphone”. Here how it sounds nice, “s m a r t p h o n e”.

Wow!

Looks like something must be  in my pocket.

Rapidly, mid tier devices have been simply redisegned in a slide shell shape with a big screen and two or three buttons below.

Voilat! Here comes the low cost smartphone!

But the Apple stuff is still the coolest thing; as Java ME was running a bit outdated (not even mentioning Symbian), there was an urgent need of something….,  I would say…, “geeky” enough.

Google raised as rebels leader with its “Android”, while others organized several “open source revolution” events to mix up and spawn a plethora of OS, each with their own SDK.

Of course everyone pretended to be the most “pure” among “open”, and complained about fragmentation (as if BMW complained with Ssangyong for having built a car).

Someone proposed to deliver a platform and a SDK to the open source community but suggested to become the unique validation body. Once realized that “native open source developers” where sitting in another room sharing their  code, and the few listening were laughing, then they got back home and delivered yet another platform/SDK.

The other speeches with no listeners were the operators room. They had group therapy to tell each other “I am not dumb, I am not dumb, I can admit I am a pipe but not a dumb one”.

Then they decided to make a deal with developers: we will give you nice network APIs and cool market place to sell your apps.  Of course this will be quite expensive but if you come to us, maybe the son of  the son of your son will see the delivery of a useful network API, promised.

Pipes thought developers were dumb. But they were smart enough.

Back to Android, it looked more like a the name of a mobile manufacturer rather than of an OS, as you could find a different platform release for about each model launched (!)

In all this “tourbillon”,  the Palm funeral was pretty sad.

I still use a Palm Treo Pro with WM6.1  (a kind gift from Palm).  A romantic dead man walking, body and soul.

Wholesale consulting

http://www.wholesaleappcommunity.com/

The larger the customer base you’re aiming to reach, the higher you should move the standard entry point, the interface between what “uses” the part below and what is provided to the part above.

Once you reached the right layer to standardize, you need to enlarge the participants.

The “open source” operators make up led simply to renaming these groups from committees to communities.

Alliances, bigger ones, yet another “biggerer” one.

When they name operating systems, they say “such as Symbian, Android, Windows etc”.

What is “etc”? If you are a developer, this means you should not care. OS and network should be a black box for you (or a transparent box).

But that’s the point. Is that a  black box or a transparent box? The openness point has moved here now.

If for developers it is not so important whether the box is black or transparent, for suppliers and consulting firms supporting operators in middleware implementation that is a key point.

If it is a matter of  ”apps”, we don’t really care too much. But for those apps formerly knows as (huge revenue) services…well guys…that’s quite interesting isn’t it.

Can operators be the “sellers” and some other be the whole resalers?

Yet another developer community?

http://developer.limofoundation.org/

We’ll see. Anyway this seems to come with perfect timing, even if many were wondering about lack of initiatives from LiMo, as if they weren’t able to keep confused promises.

Here they comes. I see simplicity here. The web site, the device, everything seems very basic, a good point to start for begineers. This is giving me the sense of tyding up a very complicated and confused melting pot of initiatives and communities.

Let’s get started then.

Ops, the SDK is still yet to come, rats.

Stay Cool with (missed) revolutions

kid-snoopy_cool

 After almost 10 years spent in the Telco world I can remember that:

It had been cool to be a RF engineer, and have a deep knowledge of radio protocols and modulation. Then it had been cool to know about networking protocols to be on the edge of the WAP (missed) revolution. Then it had been cool to know everything about videotelephony and H.324 protocol for the (missed) video telco revolution. Then it had been cool to be a Java testing expert for the upcoming (missed) java app revolution. Then it had been cool to be a IMS  expert to give origin to the (missed) IMS revolution with all its great services, commencing from push to talk.

Then it had been cool to present a deep knowledge on fixed and PSTN to commence the (partially missed) convergence  Telco revolution. You could also choose in that period to be a Wi-Fi expert for the upcoming (missed) Wi-Fi and Wi-Max  revolution. In that period. In the mean time it was cool to know everything about rich messaging and strange on screen banner broadcasting bullshit (ops, sorry about that!)

It has then been cool to be a LTE expert for the upcoming (?) LTE high datarate revolution, while now it’s really cool to be a mobile application expert for the Mobile 2.0 revolution.

It is me or cool experts have a bad influence on revolutions?

Fast as saying “WiPhone”

http://wiphone.tiscali.it/servizi/

Immagine

The phone as a service enabler. Your phone. The device you already have in your pocket. The handset someone else sold you (to make money with it).

You take it, you empower it with a client.

And you shift to another service usage, which turns, modifies upside down and inside out your service.

Ok ok ok …not that easy, wi-fi ….yes I know we are in Italy…yes of course you have to pay…I understand.

But for some users (with specific needs) it’s a sort of revolution and saving at no cost.